Updated as of 14 March 2025
The objective of this roadmap is to ensure that an Independent Panel for Evidence for Action against Antimicrobial Resistance (IPEA) is established and commences its work as soon as practicable in 2025. The roadmap outlines the steps necessary for establishing the panel, facilitated by the Quadripartite organizations, in response to the 79th United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) Political Declaration on antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This document details an open and transparent process following the key principle of “form follows function” and drawing on past discussions and lessons from other science-policy interfaces such as "Strengthening the Science-Policy Interface: A gap analysis" (2017); "Assessment of options for strengthening the science-policy interface at the international level for the sound management of chemicals and waste" (2020) and "Reflecting on the Past and Imagining the Future: A contribution to the dialogue on the Science-Policy Interface"( 2022).
AMR is a global, multifaceted threat that undermines the effectiveness of modern medicine, prolongs illness, reduces agricultural productivity, and disrupts economies. It is also linked to pollution and the environment, and hampers progress towards attainment of the Sustainable Development Goals. As a cross-sectoral challenge affecting human health, animal health, agrifood systems, and the environment, AMR requires a coordinated, science-driven and global response.
In 2019, the Inter-Agency Coordination Group on AMR (IACG) recommended establishing an IPEA as part of AMR global governance structures alongside the Global Leaders Group (GLG) on AMR and the AMR Multistakeholder Partnership Platform (MSPP). While these two structures are already operational, IPEA remains to be established. The 79th UNGA Political Declaration called on the Quadripartite organizations to establish IPEA by 2025, ensuring an inclusive and transparent consultative process with all Member States on its composition, mandate, scope and deliverables, and serves as the guide for this roadmap.
Effective AMR policymaking requires reliable and robust interdisciplinary scientific evidence, yet current data are often fragmented across sectors. This limits the ability of policymakers to evaluate, prioritize and implement high-impact interventions and act on proven solutions. Additionally, significant evidence gaps limit progress and weaken the case for essential and sustainable funding and interventions. Independent science panels, such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response, have successfully driven global consensus and fostered actions on complex issues. To this end, independent panel for evidence for action against antimicrobial resistance will facilitate the generation and use of multisectoral, scientific evidence to support Member States in efforts to tackle antimicrobial resistance, making use of existing resources and avoiding duplication of ongoing efforts.
A broad, inclusive, and transparent consultative process is essential to ensure that Member States and stakeholders agree on the key elements for establishing IPEA. The process, to be undertaken jointly by the Quadripartite organizations, will include:
A comparative analysis of existing science-policy panels will be conducted to identify governance structures, functions, costs, and operational models relevant to the IPEA. The analysis will provide background on establishing, running and providing secretariat services for independent, authoritative and policy-relevant science-policy panels. The outcome of the assessment will guide development of foundational documentation for the IPEA and identify key elements that need to be the subject of consultation so that the IPEA is scientifically credible, policy-relevant, and politically legitimate.
Activities: Desk review of the documents and operations related to existing science panels.
Output: An assessment report of models of existing science panels that could inform the establishment of the IPEA.
A comprehensive stakeholder engagement strategy will be developed to ensure inclusivity, particularly of the views and needs of low- and middle-income countries' (LMICs). Stakeholder consultations will be conducted including via the AMR Multistakeholder Partnership Platform based on its initial membership database, as a facilitating and hosting mechanism for these activities.
Activities:
Output:
Broad consultations will be held to gather written input from Member States, stakeholders, and experts on priorities, the IPEA’s governance model, and scope of work
Activities:
Output:
The successful operation of the panel will require clear and detailed guidance on how assessments and other deliverables are produced. This activity will involve supporting the panel in developing key guidance documents for its work, ensuring scientific rigor, transparency, and inclusiveness.
Activities:
Output: Guidance documents for the operations of the panel on scientific assessment rules, processes and procedures, policy recommendation framework and other deliverables.
Upon refining all relevant documents, the resulting draft framework will be published to obtain stakeholders and Member States' final feedback. based on consultations. The IPEA establishment framework will then be finalized and the panel will be launched at a high level, preferably on the sidelines of a high-level event of UN Member States, such as the United Nations Environment Assembly (UNEA) or a similar occasion, to be held in December 2025.
Activities:
Outputs:
Sustained financial and in-kind resources are essential for the long-term success of the Panel. Resource mobilization efforts should focus on securing contributions from a variety of sources, including governments, international organizations, philanthropic foundations, and the private sector. The Quadripartite organizations will incorporate resource mobilization efforts as part of their resource mobilization strategy, including through the AMR Multi-Partner Trust Fund.
Activities:
Output: Resource mobilization strategy, funding commitments from key donors and partners, including development banks, the private sector and governments.
To raise awareness and ensure that policymakers are engaged and ready to own the mission and deliverables of the Panel, it is essential to engage stakeholders, including the public, through an effective communication and outreach strategy. This will include engaging with the media, civil society, and other relevant actors and platforms.
Activities:
Output: Communication materials, outreach strategy document, launch of communication channels (website, social media), and regular updates and engagement with the media